You have missed an important piece in the AI debate. That is the cost in terms of energy and water consumption that AI requires, along with the very real decisions made by very real plutocrats about who suffers the side effects of pollution generated by the power creation and deficit of potable water. AI is indeed "artificial" in the sense of created by humans, but very much NOT "intelligent" in the sense of being able to make consistent and reasonable decisions based on any conceptual framework except that built in by the creators of the particular AI entity. All AI can be "socialized" to transmit the stance of its creators without revealing that its' outputs are determined by that stance.
You have missed an important piece in the AI debate. That is the cost in terms of energy and water consumption that AI requires, along with the very real decisions made by very real plutocrats about who suffers the side effects of pollution generated by the power creation and deficit of potable water. AI is indeed "artificial" in the sense of created by humans, but very much NOT "intelligent" in the sense of being able to make consistent and reasonable decisions based on any conceptual framework except that built in by the creators of the particular AI entity. All AI can be "socialized" to transmit the stance of its creators without revealing that its' outputs are determined by that stance.